h y p e r b l o g

Constructive Hypertexts (Second Paper)
28 Noviembre 2008, 3:33 am
Filed under: métodos,narrativa | Etiquetas:

This new term, which I’m going to use in my second paper, appeared today in Narrativa’s class, when we were reading  Mychael Joyce’s text ” Notes Toward an Unwritten Non-Linear Electronic Text, “The Ends of Print Culture””.

Constructive hypertexts: allows the reader to build, to interact with the original text ( that’s what we’ll do in the Second Paper). “Every reading of the transformed texts should rehearse the transformation made by the intervention of the interlocutory reader”. Joyce’s mor talkin about rewriting, renarrating and that is not that much our case, but we are gonna have that dialog with the author by creating our own hypertext.

*Topographic organization of the text: constitutes and transforms the current state of the text.

So, this new term, Constructive Hypertext, is gonna be useful for me. Now, I know the hypertext I’m gonna create, is going to have a determinate kind of links, and also I know the kind of hypertext it is going to be. More for my hypertext’s inventory.

Theory to add (Second Paper)
28 Noviembre 2008, 3:18 am
Filed under: métodos,narrativa | Etiquetas:

As I was doing my Inventory today, with all of those terms which I sortly made up about the types of screens, the types of images… suddenly today in Métodos class we saw the Deena LArsen text called “A Plea for Connections. Links Convey Meaning”.

Deena has her own theory to classify Links and that gave me a new perspective. Something to add to my inventory. The truth is that I’ve realized with this text that I was forgetting to mention one of the main tools. And the reason why was (and now I know it!) because most of the Links from whoisflora’s hypertext are invisible!.

I’ve talked about links, but only as a part of images, and that shouldn’t be like that, because images are a part of those Links. It is curious, after so much classes listening about links, and I was focusing more in aspects like kinds of images, kinds of music.. Well, of curse, I’m gonna focus in all of those aspects, but links have to have their protagonism, as they are the main tool of the hypertext.

As we saw today in class, and from the point of view of Deena, there are 2 kinds of Links:

  • Visible Links
  • Invisible Links (more intuitive, such as the ones integrated in images)

And there are 7 types of Links depending on the purpose of them, or their function in the text:

  • Denotative Links (common type in enciclopedias)
  • Connotative Links: you provide the place in which that part of the text is included.
  • Similar links/Repetitive Links: the link goes to a similar node or a continuation of the same theme.
  • Oposition or contradiction: the link goes to a node that contradicts or opposes the original text.
  • Descriptive: the link goes to a further description or explanation of the linked word/original text.
  • Advertisements: the link goes to a site that sells that particular item (commercial websites)
  • Political: the peace hopes to provoke a reaction in the reader and provides a link

Way of marking Links: how the Links will be seen and how much emphasis the reader will place in these links. (I’ll use this in my secondpaper too).

But also I’m thinking about applying all of this information with my own hypertext, not just with the Whoisflora?’s one. What tools am I gonna use in mine?

I think I’ll add a brief inventory about that.

time for relax
28 Noviembre 2008, 0:43 am
Filed under: General

I have too many things in mind about the Second Paper. This is becoming a kind of obsession (hahahaha); in fact I came to the computer to see a tv show like Gossip Girl or whatever to disconnect. But thoughts came to my mind, and it is hard to resist. I’m starting to feel really confortable with the blog. At the very beginning it was mor like an experiment. I wasn’t sure about its utility, and I wasn’t even sure if I was really going to use it.

I’ve found this funny web page for those who wonder: is it going to rain?

I’ve added it to my links on the right bar, with some other links (i’ll keep adding).

Let’s have a little break.

Special Delivery
28 Noviembre 2008, 0:21 am
Filed under: General | Etiquetas:

Yesterday I got an e-mail from Steven D. Krause with some interesting things, so I though I should share them here with you all.

“…my apologies for not getting back to you on the stuff about hypetexts. I think you are right that a lot of what was there isn’t anymore, though it looks to me (judging from your blog, at least) that you’ve found some to talk about. There’s a some kind of interesting things going on that are more “multimedia” than they are hypertextual, if you get my sense there.

I know he isn’t saying that much here, but this words made me think. I told Steven in my e-mail that most of the hypertexts were disappearing, and also I was wondering to myself what was going on with hypertextual literature, as it was hard to find recently published literary hypertexts. As here is saying Steven, they are going more multimedia now, so that could be the reason why. Maybe, instead of looking ffor “literary hypertexts” or “hypertextual narrative” I should use another term. Maybe it all has developed into something else, I mean: they are not so much textual right now; or maybe they have been integrated with the web.

The  “hypertexts” we are seeing in class are a new literary form, a new way of art; but as the tool is computers and internet, it is soooo much easy for them to develop into something new.

Right now, from my point of view we can find literary hypertexts everywhere, maybe not with the form we’ve been knowing them until now. As happens with the hypertexts we already know, anyone could be a writer, an artist, because the tool and the internet is accesible to almost everyone. And what’s happening now is that, artists are developing a lot of new tools. For example, you can go to twitter and there are writers who are writing a sort of story, a hypertext, using that specific tool. Of course, anyone can be a writer; but I’m not going to deal with that now. What I’m talking about is the new wave of artists, whoms main tool right now is Internet, and Internet evironments. For instance, I have a friend who’s an artist (Jose Manuel Hortelano), and his main tool is Internet. He’s a painter and he draws in paper, then scans his pictures, and manipulates them (or not) with the computer, and then he leaves them there in the internet, in places like devianart, fotolog,etc. and gives the original picture to whoever wants it. He’s main tool is internet, and that’s why he’s starting to get famous right now. Because, Internet is nowadays the most powerful tool, no matter what the  subject is: arts, politics,..

In add to all of these things I’m saying, I found a link in Steven’s blog called New Study Shows Time Spent Online Important for Teen Development. After reading it, I find it really hard not thinking that Internet is the future. Well, in fact, for me Internet is the present time, that era has already come for some people like me, and people like Steven Krause and like Vicente Fores, who try to apply these new technologies (some of then not so new) to the academic system.

Steven also gave me a link to a very interesting web page; it is from Stuart Moulthrop, and there I found a very interesting essay (and easy reading) which is helpful with what I’m saying here. It is called After the Last Generation: Rethinking Scholarship in the Days of Serious Play :

“This paper picks up on speculations about likely changes in the nature and structure of higher education under the influence of video games and other forms of cybertext. It looks specifically at changes in the primary mode of academic production, arguing that significant space needs to be made for practical engagement alongside theory and criticism. A new genre of formal academic work is proposed, called the intervention, a serious work of application intended to contribute to pragmatics as well as abstract understanding.”

The intervention, a new term for me.

Please, let’s go to the era of Intervention !!!!!

*This is an aweful way of ending, I know, but, I think after that essay I’ve ended up with, there’s nothing more for me to say. I recommend you to read it, of course.

Inventory (Second Paper)
27 Noviembre 2008, 12:56 pm
Filed under: métodos,narrativa | Etiquetas:

I’m going to make an inventory of the tools used in this hypertext. Some of them are terms I invented (I’ll give the definition of each of those terms) and some others are terms that already exist. Making this inventory will help me out to get the main idea of the tools of this hypertext, summarizing all of the work I’ve been doing since now in connection with TOOLS.

  1. We have Images which can be:
  • Still images
  • Animated Images

(theses types do not have any function in the hypertext)

  • Clickable Images
  • Clickable-animated Images

(these types link you to somewhere in the hypertext)

And there’s another type os Images, which I still don’t know how to call them. They are not clickable images, but they have a special function: if you put the mouse over them, something happens: appears text, activates an animation.. I’ll think about a term for these ones.

2. Screens: as the hypertext is made by Macromedia Flash, I have distinguished between 5 kinds of screens, some of them depending on the purpose, some others depending on the location, and the importance in the hypertext.

  • Main-screens: these are the main screens of the hypertext, and they all have “postcards” from Flora.
  • Right-screens: screens located at the right of the main-screen where the author has added her own thoughts and her reflections about travel and time
  • Informative-screens: inside of this type you can find the Tutorial-screens. Theses screens’ aim is to inform, or are used by the author as a tool for showing the reader how to use this hypertext.
  • Subscreens : screens inside a main-screen.
  • Introduction-screen : the first screen we find, before the hypertext starts.

3. Music: every single main-screen has music and it changes depending on the main-screen that we are. The author has used fragments of songs, not entire songs.

  • Introduction-screen music
  • Main-screen 1 (Michigan) music
  • Main-screen 2 (Ohio) music
  • Main screen 3 (New Jersey) music
  • Main-screen 4 (Arkansas) music
  • Main-screen 5 (West Texas) music


Feel free to comment (please!)
26 Noviembre 2008, 16:44 pm
Filed under: General

It feels good when you realize your blog is useful someway.

Thank you “acuenmon” for your comments, and please! I invite everyone who’s reading my blog to comment whatever they think about anything.

Thanks for reading this blog.

Reading the Hypertext-Rules & Tools(Second Paper)
26 Noviembre 2008, 10:50 am
Filed under: métodos,narrativa | Etiquetas:

R U L E S A N D T O O L S :

I’m going to describe the tools used by the author and the rules we follow to read the hypertext. As it has been done with flash, I’m going to divide it in “screens”, and in each screen I’ll talk about all of the elements such as animations, music, text, clickable images, screens inside of screens,… And also i’ll talk about the rules the author has given us to read this hypertext, or at least my hypothesis of how she wants us to read it, from my interpretation of it all.Let’s start!

1st screen:


The path the author wants us to follow is quite easy to see. In the first clickeable screen we find an introduction of the hypertext – it tells us what is it about, but mainly what it tell us is the story of where does the story comes from, who is that Flora- and there at the end of that introduction there’s a link which says clearly “ENTER”, and that is the link that’ll take us to the hypertext. That’s the only path we can follow right now.

2nd screen(opened in a new window):


Then, a new window appears, and before starting the hypertext the author shows you how it all works. It is telling you more or less the path you’re going to follow to get the story, the understand it. So, that’s why I was saying in this hypertext is quite easy to see the rules the author wants you to follow. From the beginning she’s telling us How it works. Maybe is not exactly a path, because she’s not telling us to follow rules to read it, but she’s do telling us to follow rules to understand how it works.

In this screen she give us the option of “skip” it, if you already have seen it and you don’t need to see it again. And this is not just an image, is an animation, made by flash; a kind of tutorial.

If you don’t click to “skip” and wait until the “tutorial” has ended up, the hypertext will start automatically.

3rd screen – SUMMER:


I’m going to describe all the interactive elements we can find in this screen:


This banner appears all the time, in every screen. In you click in “About this project” it takes you to this new screen under the other one (this is an example of what I said in the introduction´: “screens inside screens”; I’m gonna call them Subscreens):


This subscreen has information about Flora’s project, and tells us who she was, adding more info to the introduction. In the “Camera Obscura” section the author explains the process of creation of this hypertext: I have taken the postcards, read what they said (they were often addressed to different members of her family, which she must have retreived as they grew oold and died), and created my own impression of why she traveled. The cards are arranged chronologically, so I have reason to believe they follow her different paths across the country.

The most important part of this section for me is when she says: To the right of some Flora’s “screens” have added my own thoughts– my refections on travel and time, in response to Flora.

So here the author is telling a very important clue to understand the hypertext: first, we have the “Main-screens“, which are arranged chronologically, and inside these main screens, we can find some “Right-screens” where the author has added her own thoughts and her reflections about travel and time.

At the end of this “informative-screen” theres a section called “Get the whole story!” with a link to a pdf’s file, which provides you with more info about this hypertext. Yummy!


And then there’s the link: back to Flora which will take us back to the Main-screen.


The little map in the upper-left corner of the main-screen will be our route guide, and we’ll use it when we’ve finished reading all the main and right screens, because it’ll take us to another place and time of Flora’s trip(to another main-screen).


The green bird is a clickable picture (I’ll call these elements clickable-pics ) and if you click on it is days: “Life” “Beauty”. I’m not quite suro of what is it for; maybe it’s just a decorative element, or maybe it’s describing that moment, that summer in Copper Harbor. I’m not sure yet.


This is a clickable-animated-pic, which becomes an animation when you put the mouse on it; it is a kind of flap; if you click on it, it will open a subscreen with text. This subscreen is formed of 5 more (this is number 1), and the way to get to the other is by clicking in the numbers under the text. To follow the author rules (or at least, the rules I think the author wants us to follow) we’ll read the text in order, as if it was a lineal text, from the first one to the 6th. Of course you could read the text with no order, but that’s not what we’re going to follow right now.


And then we find these birds, which are clickable-animated-pics, and each of them has a message of Flora when you click, where she’s telling her mother she has to leave, in what it seems to be a postcard. In the last bird, you can read: “I suposse I need to choose a path and follow it”. And that’s what I’m doing with this hypertext.


And the last element of this page is anothe clickable-animated(it gets bigger when you click it)-pic, which takes us to the authors thoughts, to what I’ve named a Right-screen, which is a main-screen inside the main-screen, but as that was way too complicated to name it, I decided to name it right-screen, because that second main-screen is at the right side of the main-screen. This element appears always when the author wants to take us to 1999, to the way she thinks about Flora’s feelings, to what she thinks about her trip.


26 Noviembre 2008, 3:00 am
Filed under: General | Etiquetas:

Working with my computer and an internet connection sometimes is a problem for me. Like tonight. I was trying to focus and re-read the hypertext, but, suddenly a friend of mine sent to me a video from youtube, and suddenly i couldn’t stop watching videos. I’ve been laughing like an hour. I know that is not what I was suposed to do right now, and now I feel I should share those videos with you! So, this is a new section of my blog (hahaha). Btw, it is good having a break and laughing a little bit after a hard day of work!, and, this is a hypertext, isn’t it? links, pictures…videos!

(this is the “chain” of videos I’ve been watching a few minutes ago)

(I think I’ll become a subscriber of this Ellen’s fans club or something, haha)

And to finish with this SO MUCH academic post, I’ll add a video from my favourite youtube show “Will it blend?” with the great host Tom Dickson! this time blending an Iphone…will it blend??

Apply what u read with your hypertext! (class-notes)
26 Noviembre 2008, 0:46 am
Filed under: métodos | Etiquetas: ,


Post-structuralism and Deconstruction (synonimous)- it is a reaction of structuralism and works against seeing language as stable, as a closed system (language as self-contained).

-The western ideal- the word (logo) into the centre of our beens=logocentrism: at the begginning  was the word, nothing existed before the word.

Deconstruction- (as Derridas meant) decentring the text, interpreting the text from different points of view. What we are going to change is the way of looking at the reality, where the logo, the word, is not necessarly the center. We want to expand our knowledge, and we look at the text from different points of view/perspectives. You can read the narrative as you like.

Decentring: multiple perspectives. All texts are correct or incorrect, depending on who’s  reading them.

The author does not create the text- the text is created by reading it.

Anything goes- every opinion is valid. One person’s opinion is as valid as the author or anyoneelse’s opinion. With deconstructition there’s people who may know more about the text than the author himself. Deconstructing the novel= getting yourself in a position that you can read the text from many different points of view.

We are stablishing the difference between one word and another

Dialog with the text!


This ideas where from today’s metodos class. Deconstruction and Post-strcuturalism have a lot to do with the Second Paper, as we are going to have that dialog with the text, analysing it, and giving our opinion about the structura, the text, the logos- no closed system: as we’ll have to give hypothesis about the text, seing it from different points of view, text is not goint to be stable at all.

And none of our analyses will be objective.

How am I gonna do this – trying to organize my ideas (Second Paper)
26 Noviembre 2008, 0:21 am
Filed under: métodos,narrativa | Etiquetas:

I’m thinking about an structure for my Second Paper. I want to have a kind of introduction to the author, with a brief biography and links to other works she has; and also an introduction to the hypertext: what is it about. Then, I think I’ll have first of all the part of Tools, where I’ll talk about the tools the author has used in this hypertext (links, paths, pictures, animations, music, etc), and also I’ll have another part for the Narration, with my opinion about the structure of it. And for all of this I’ll use also the text we have to read. I’m gonna start with this idea tonight, so I’m not quite sure yet of how am I gonna do it at the end, but as I read the theoretical texts, I’m gonna try to use examples from my hypertext from all of those theries, and then use it all for my second paper. I don’t know yet how, but that’s the main idea: link the heoretical texts with the blog, and then link the ideas of my blog with my second paper/web page.

But, before starting with connecting the texts, I’m gonna read “Who is Flora?”. I read it 2 weeks ago, but, re-reading is important!